ScammerWatch uses an evidence-first review process. We do not mark a website, token, platform, or person as fraudulent based only on one complaint. Each report is classified by evidence level and updated when new information appears.
How ScammerWatch Reviews Fraud Reports
Report Statuses
Submitted
Received but not reviewed yet.
Insufficient Evidence
Not enough information to classify the case.
Under Review
Evidence is being checked.
Rejected
The report appears false, irrelevant, abusive, or unsupported.
Verified Risk
Multiple risk signals or evidence items were confirmed.
Resolved / Updated
New information changed the report status.
Evidence Checklist
The following evidence types strengthen a report and increase the chance of provider action.
Suspicious URL
Payment request details
Domain / hosting data
Email address / phone number / social account used by suspected scammer
Date and time of incident
Brand impersonation evidence
Screenshots
Chat logs or emails
Wallet address or transaction ID
Provider-Ready Reports
When a report reaches Verified Risk status, we prepare a structured case file suitable for submission to registrars, hosting providers, payment processors, and security teams. The goal is to reduce the back-and-forth that slows down abuse handling.
- Suspicious URL
- Report category
- Screenshots
- Timestamps
- Short incident summary
- Reporter statement
- Technical indicators when available
- Current review status
Working with providers
We are building direct intake workflows with registrars, hosting providers, and security teams. If you process abuse reports and want to receive structured case files from ScammerWatch, reach out directly.